What Would Need to Be True
Evidence that working with a part (as a relational entity with interiority) produces different outcomes than behavioral or cognitive approaches that address the circuit's output directly — which would suggest the part's interiority is real and clinically relevant, not just a useful frame
A theory of how neurological circuits and psychological sub-personalities interact — are they parallel systems, layered systems, or different descriptions of the same system?
Cases in which a part's interiority overrides a circuit's activation — where what the part wants changes the outcome despite the circuit's activation pressure — versus cases where the circuit overwhelms even a relatively Self-led system