Creative
Creative

"I Used to Put All These Parameters on Myself"

Creative Practice

"I Used to Put All These Parameters on Myself"

Talking with Paul McCartney, of all people, Taylor Swift described what changed during lockdown in a sentence that's easy to read past too quickly: "I just thought there are no rules anymore, because I used to put all these parameters on myself, like, 'How will this song sound in a stadium?
developing·concept·1 source··Jul 11, 2026

"I Used to Put All These Parameters on Myself"

Talking with Paul McCartney, of all people, Taylor Swift described what changed during lockdown in a sentence that's easy to read past too quickly: "I just thought there are no rules anymore, because I used to put all these parameters on myself, like, 'How will this song sound in a stadium? How will this song sound on radio?'"1

Notice what she's naming. Not label pressure. Not a producer's demands. Parameters she put on herself. The constraints limiting Lover weren't imposed from outside at all — they were self-generated, built from years of writing toward stadiums and radio formats until the questions became automatic, asked before a lyric even got written down.

Why Removing Self-Imposed Constraints Is Harder Than Removing External Ones

External constraints are easy to identify and, eventually, easy to escape — change labels, renegotiate a contract, fire a difficult collaborator. Self-imposed constraints are harder on both counts. You can't quit yourself. The questions "how will this sound in a stadium" and "how will this sound on radio" had become so automatic, after over a decade of stadium tours and radio-single campaigns, that noticing them as choices rather than facts about how songs simply have to work required something disruptive enough to interrupt the whole operating pattern.

The pandemic supplied exactly that disruption. Lover Fest got postponed, then canceled outright.1 No stadium tour meant no stadium to write toward. No promotional calendar meant no radio-single deadline shaping which songs got prioritized. The external scaffolding that had been quietly generating those internal parameters for years simply wasn't there anymore, and its absence is what let her notice the parameters had been optional the whole time.

What Removing the Parameters Actually Produced

Her own description of the songwriting process that followed is worth reading closely: "A lot of this album was kind of distilled down to the purest version of what the story is. Songwriting on this album is exactly the way that I would write if I considered nothing else other than, 'What words do I want to write? What stories do I want to tell? What melodies do I want to sing? What production is essential to tell those stories?'"1 Every question in that list is about the work itself. None of them is about an audience's expected reaction, a chart position, or a live-show translation. That's the actual content of "no rules anymore" — not fewer creative standards, but standards relocated entirely inside the work instead of split between the work and its eventual commercial performance.

The book frames the result plainly: looking back at Lover, it's clear Swift had overdone everything — too much production, too much confection, too much pastel.1 Folklore's starkness reads, in that light, less like a stylistic preference and more like the direct negative image of everything the stadium-and-radio parameters had been pushing her toward.

The Collaborator Choice as Evidence of the Same Shift

The book treats her choice of Aaron Dessner as inseparable from this same constraint-removal — a producer known for brooding, avant-garde, cerebral work, about as far from "how will this sound in a stadium" as a collaborator could plausibly be.1 Working with someone whose entire sonic vocabulary had never once been optimized for stadium translation was, functionally, a second, external confirmation of the internal permission she'd already given herself. She wasn't just telling herself the parameters were gone. She was choosing collaborators who'd never had those parameters to begin with.

Implementation Workflow

You've built a body of successful work by internalizing a set of practical constraints — audience expectations, format requirements, commercial considerations — so completely that you no longer experience them as choices, just as facts about how the work has to be done.

Notice that a genuine disruption to your usual working conditions (a forced pause, a changed collaborator, an audience that temporarily can't respond the way it usually does) is often what makes an invisible, internalized constraint visible again. Once visible, ask which of your habitual questions are actually serving the work and which ones have just been running on inertia since the conditions that originally justified them changed or disappeared.

Evidence, Tensions, and Open Questions

Swift's own quotes to McCartney and Entertainment Weekly are directly documented, giving strong first-person evidence for the mechanism described. The tension: it's genuinely hard to separate how much of Folklore's creative shift came from constraint removal specifically versus simply working with a new collaborator whose instincts pulled naturally in a different direction — the two changes happened simultaneously, and the book doesn't fully untangle which one did more of the actual work.

Author Tensions & Convergences

The book presents this pivot as an unambiguous creative liberation without asking what was lost in the parameters that got removed. Some of those self-imposed questions — will this work in a stadium, will this work on radio — aren't purely limiting; they're also what let her build one of the most successful live-performance careers in music history. The book celebrates their removal for one album without examining whether an artist who abandoned them permanently would have been able to build the audience Folklore was released into in the first place.

Cross-Domain Handshakes

Deliberate vs. Intrusive Rumination and Creativity — that page names a psychological distinction between productive and unproductive dwelling on a problem; this page's constraint-removal mechanism shows a related but distinct process, where the productive move isn't dwelling on a problem differently, but noticing that a long-internalized constraint was never actually a fixed feature of the problem at all.

The Pandemic as Forced-Reinvention Catalyst — this page names the internal creative mechanism; that page names the external shock that made the internal shift possible in the first place. Neither fully explains Folklore without the other: the pandemic alone doesn't guarantee an artist notices their self-imposed parameters, and the noticing alone doesn't happen without some disruption removing the scaffolding that had been generating the parameters continuously.

The Live Edge

Sharpest implication: the most limiting creative constraints are often the ones you've stopped experiencing as constraints at all — external rules are visible and arguable, but self-imposed ones that have calcified into "how things just work" require an actual disruption to your normal operating conditions before you can even see them clearly enough to question them.

Generative questions:

  • Is there a way to deliberately manufacture this kind of disruption without waiting for an external shock like a pandemic to force it — could an artist schedule a periodic "no stadium, no radio" constraint-audit into their own process voluntarily?
  • Given that the removed parameters had also built her enormous commercial success, was the actual insight here "these parameters were never necessary," or "these parameters are necessary most of the time, and periodically suspending them produces valuable but non-repeatable exceptions"?

Connected Concepts

Footnotes

domainCreative Practice
developing
sources1
complexity
createdJul 11, 2026
inbound links5