Channel: Daiva Anugraha ("Bhairava Anugraha" paddhati)
Speaker: unnamed presenter, the channel's usual teacher
Published: 2025-12-17
Original file: Clippings/अघोरा भैरव मुक्ति की अग्नि शिव के पांच मुखों से तंत्र के सबसे गहरे रहस्य तक.md — 309 lines. Devanagari title; the spoken content is English throughout, with auto-generated captions.
Source type: video transcript, practitioner register
Corpus code: AG
Aghora is the south-facing face, and the fire it carries is cleansing rather than punitive. The episode presents itself as a continuation of the channel's earlier Pañcavaktra material and walks the five faces again on the way to its own subject, which is why Aghora specifically matters to a sādhaka. It also names Aghora as the forty-sixth svarūpa within the hundred and eight, and it treats the kriyā-yajña and the five yajña types as the practical shape of that fire.
Auto-generated captions, with the Sanskrit heavily mangled. No verse locators for either purāṇa named.
An internal ordering conflict, recorded here because it is a fact about the source rather than about any one page built from it: this episode numbers the five faces differently from the channel's own Pañcavaktra episode. Here Īśāna is called the fourth phase and Aghora the fifth. There, Aghora is third, Tatpuruṣa fourth and Īśāna fifth. Vāmadeva is second in both. Neither episode acknowledges the other's ordering. This is not resolved.
⚑ A candidate contradiction inside this single episode, found 2026-08-20 at cluster B and recorded as a candidate, not asserted. At 2:49 the teacher gives the standard enumeration — 112 svarūpas, five gopya, 108 known from the tantra perspective. At 43:06 he says "each faces 108 surupas." Five faces at 108 each is not 108 total. This matters beyond the arithmetic: every other contradiction documented in this corpus is one episode against another, and the build's working description of the corpus is that it never contradicts itself within a single episode. The 43:06 passage is transcribed loosely enough to be a mangled restatement of 2:49 rather than a new claim, so it has not been treated as an exception to that pattern. Recorded so a later reader can test it against the audio.
Classification rationale: transcript — a caption file, not authored text. The register is practitioner throughout.
Claims carry [PARAPHRASED]. Doctrinal claims are the source's and are reported as the source's. The Daiva Anugraha trust-flag applies: repetition inside this corpus does not corroborate — the same teacher restating a claim in a second episode is one witness twice, not two witnesses.
Delivered from an unnamed lineage position with no external corroboration and no cited locators. Consistent with the rest of the channel.